Showing posts with label SWOT analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SWOT analysis. Show all posts

Friday, 3 October 2014

Marketing Management and Planning

Executive Summary
This report endeavours to study the market positioning, strategy and the overall marketing plan of Virgin Australia Holdings Limited. The findings of the report have been astounding and it has been unearthed that some of the strategic issues facing the company are due to its recent repositioning move which has left the air carrier somewhere in the middle. The report contemplates whether such a positioning is sustainable in the long term given Virgin’s resolve to provide quality services for a budget in the face of economic crisis (when it’s hard to control costs).
Supported with sound reason, the researcher finds it apt that Virgin stands a chance to strongly differentiate itself from the competition by following and bettering on the ‘new world carrier’ strategy; as this is a first in the market and enjoys best of both worlds, by delivering a unique, fun culture to the customer at budget prices.

Introduction

This report aims to analyse the current situation, strategic choices as well as issues facing Virgin Australia Holdings. The researcher studies the macro environment as well as the industry’s internal environment through various models and attempts at suggesting a plausible course of action for future endeavours.

Product Overview

Virgin Australia launched as country’s first low fare airline, on August 31, 2000; thus, ending a long sustained duopoly of Qantas and Ansett in the Australian air transportation industry.
The airline company toed in line with its parent Virgin, which is well known for its innovative and fun approach to business; keeping its customer’s happy being the prime motto. However, over time Virgin Australia has also secured a reputation of a value for money, punctual and customer oriented air service.
The company has even diversified by securing various partnerships (in the form of Joint ventures) and had launched Pacific Blue and Polynesian Blue to cater to larger markets both domestic and overseas. It now holds over 31% of the market share of the Australian airline industry and thus, the second biggest player in the market.

Current Strategy

When the airline first launched, it introduced itself as a low cost carrier for some highly demanding specific routes such as that between Sydney and Brisbane. However, after Ansett closed shop, Virgin found a lucrative opportunity to expand on a larger scale as full service national airline. Also, Qantas by this time had launched a new low cost airline, Jetstar; and even Tiger Airways entered the market by 2007 and it was amply clear that Virgin could not survive solely on the basis of being a low fare affair. Thus, the management at Virgin formulated a new focus in being a ‘new world carrier’ rather than being a ‘low cost carrier’. The approach underlined under this motto is to retain the original low fare pricing but, also providing services equivalent in value as that of any regular flight. This was to retain all sorts of customers by offering value added services in addition to the low fares.
However the global economic crisis and the ever rising fuel prices over the years have reduced the profits accruing to the airline (Profits dipped by 50% in 2008 when compared to those in 2007). This cash crunch has left the airlines in a state of desperation to survive, result being a rise in fare prices and other surcharges to meet the rising costs. Thus, shift from a low cost strategy to a new world carrier strategy has only left the airlines in a state of limbo, where the uncertain pricing approach and ever rising costs, and lack of clarity about the situation has made the airline vulnerable to various threats in its internal and external environment.
In this essay we strive to study issues faced by the organisation in context of such situations as briefed above and suggest solutions in the light of the strategic position of the company.

Product Situation

The product under study in this essay is the air travel services offered by Virgin Australia. When it first launched in the Australian market Virgin positioned itself as a low cost carrier (which was a first in the Australian market) but, soon Jetstar launched in 2004 (and Tiger airways in 2007) to claim their share of the cake in the segment. Hence Virgin decided to reposition itself in the wake of declining market share and profits due to market being on the verge of saturation due to competition. The new positioning strategy now adopted was of a ‘new world carrier’ which is again a first in the market – wherein the airline focuses on providing services (as any other regular full service brand) at budget prices. However, such positioning has lead Virgin to counter competition from all quarters (from budget as well as full service players) making it difficult for the player to counter competition, control costs and maintain services all at the same time.

Sales

Virgin reported total sales of 3.59 billion USD for fiscal ending June 2012. This was an increase of 18.3% from that of 2011. Also sales have shown a continual increase for five consecutive years and have increased by 71% in this period. However, when compared to growth and sales of other airlines (especially Qantas), Virgin still needs to take the big leap and catch up to establish market hold and sustained profitability.

Distribution

Virgin’s sales materialises through usual sales channels as utilised by other airlines. What is to be noted here is, that sales for the airline also take place through e-ticketing. This is very new for the industry and is an advantage in the kitty of the company. Since, this is an easy and efficient method to book tickets, consumers find it convenient (leading to customer satisfaction) and online ticketing also saves costs for the company by reducing load on facilities such as call centres, physical booking windows and travel agent commissions (also leading to increased profits).
Overall Virgin’s distribution front is well managed and has provided the management the confidence in integrating technology in critical functions such as distribution.

Market Situation

Virgin Australia comprises of three airlines, seeking to distinguish itself by offering full services at budget fares. The airline also offers holiday packages and provides service to 29 Australian cities and 12 International destinations and consistently growing.  
When Virgin launched in Australia in August 2000, it operated only on one route with two aircrafts in service; it now owns a fleet of 68 aircrafts and services over 15 million passengers annually; and has over 80% exposure to the leisure travel market.
Virgin Australia is currently the second largest player in the industry with over 31% share of the market and its current market capitalisation is over $961 million. Its major business comes from domestic flights (over short distances) and from operating in the leisure market. The major competitive advantage of the product came from being a low fare airline; however, competition from Jetstar and Tiger Airways has required the company to adapt to a new strategy to oust the competition. Hence, Virgin is trying to woo customers by providing full services in budget fares. Also, the group is striving to gain prominence in corporate and government travel segments so as to widen its market base, increase profitability, reduce costs and establish brand’s recognition and prominence in the market.

Competitive Situation

In this section we will study the major competitors of Virgin Australia and their respective products and strategies, to analyse their intentions regarding conduct of business. The companies studied in this section are:

1.     Jet Star

Jetstar is a Melbourne based low cost airline which was started as an offshoot of Qantas to cater to the domestic leisure market and to defend Qantas position from being cannibalized by Virgin Australia, which was a market leader in the segment. Some of the key features of JetStar are listed below:
a)      Low Cost- JetStar is essentially a low cost airline. Average air price of a Jet Star air ticket is around $69 vis-à-vis $75 of a Virgin Australia ticket. However, the ticket price of Jetstar covers only point to point travel (between A and B) everything else on the flight is reportedly chargeable and often at unreasonably expensive rates. Passengers may have to shell out extra for preferred seats, in flight entertainment, even extra leg room, or to jump the queue (people carrying infants aren’t any exception to this rule). Whereas, a typical Virgin seat would contain some freebies or bare minimum essentials, such as leg room. Also, Virgin focuses a lot on promotional give away thus, frequent flyers and other customers stand to benefit from such offers.
b)      Customer Service- Jetstar has concentrated on efficiencies and cost cutting more than putting any focus on its customers. The employees seem to be untrained and ‘not very polite’ according to some passengers. Some customers of Jetstar have reported that the staff of Jetstar seem to be ‘counting minutes until knock off time’ showing least interest in service or customer satisfaction. Whereas, Virgin staff has even won various awards for customer satisfaction. All staff is smarty uniformed and ever ready to help. The company closely follows the motto of Virgin International, to keep it fun for the customers.
c)       Fleet- Jetstar owns a fleet of old aircrafts. These are high maintenance vehicles which are often fuel guzzlers. This only adds to the running costs of the airlines making it impossible to sustain the low fare structure in the foreseeable future. Also, the interiors of the flight are old and shabby. The seat covers are torn in places and the overall ambience of the flight is poorly maintained. Some passengers have even reported food and hair stuffed in gaps between seats.
The Virgin Australia flights are new and the update technology promises a lot of efficiency and lower maintenance costs. Also, the interiors are clean and inviting.
d)      Destinations- Jetstar although a leisure air service, caters to lesser destinations than Virgin Australia. Also the number of flights to certain destinations is less frequent compared to Virgin’s services.
Summing up, it can be concluded that Jetstar is not much of a competition to Virgin Australia in the low fare, leisure travel market. This is due to Jetstar’s inherent cost inefficiencies and lack of focus on customer satisfaction. However, as Virgin Australia is repositioning itself as a budget airline with full services, it may find it difficult to maintain low pricing (given rising costs and economic downturn) and can find itself vulnerable to Jetstar’s strategies, given the latter’s undying focus on positioning itself only as a low cost carrier.

2.     Qantas Airways

Virgin Australia is repositioning itself as a ‘new world carrier’ (from a low cost carrier) and is striving to be a budget airline with full services. If maintaining prices with the budget constraints was not all, the airline also faces stiff competition at the hands of Jetstar parent company Qantas (in the full service segment). Given below is a brief of key features of Qantas compared with that of Virgin:
a)      Full service flight- Qantas is essentially a full service flight, which focuses on domestic corporate and government travel market. It is the oldest and the largest national carrier of Australia and holds over 65% share of the domestic air travel market and carries approx 18% of passengers flying in and out of Australia. It has built its business as a regular fare airline focussing on customer service and satisfaction.
Virgin Australia has recently endeavoured to reposition itself as a ‘new world carrier’. Under this strategy it is striving to provide full services under a budget. This is a behemoth task to achieve and Virgin is already facing some difficulties here in maintaining prices along with services.
b)      Fleet- Qantas is now employing Airbus A-330 on some of the busiest routes (like that between Melbourne and Perth). The interiors of these planes have been tastefully done and cater to the needs of the average business traveller. Facilities like wider seats and individual workstations go a step ahead in delighting customers. Virgin on the other hand is trying to catch up with Qantas. It has been able to deploy A-330s on select routes; also the interiors done by Virgin have been cited of international quality, by various industry experts. Facilities like fully reclining seats which are well cushioned have ruled the roost here and Virgin is emerging as a winner when it comes to innovating and truly delighting customers.
c)       Customer satisfaction- As a full service carrier, customer satisfaction has been the primary focus of Qantas. Facilities like business lounges at various airports and card check ins (which are time efficient) have given customer satisfaction a priority. The airline seeks to build on this focus to retain patrons and attract new customers. However, Qantas has close competition with Virgin when it comes to delighting customers (as it is one of the founding philosophies of the latter). Virgin has left no stone unturned in innovating to pleasantly surprise a passenger. Establishing lounges and speedy grievance redressal mechanisms are some of the steps in the direction. Virgin and Qantas seem to be at par in this sphere and both of them need to continue the same to hold their ground.
Summing up, Virgin is a relatively new entrant to the full service segment hence, it may take some time before it gets a sizeable share of the market. Also, it should be noted that a player as Qantas, which is well established in the Australian domestic air travel market may not easily give up the fight to defend its share. However, Virgin is making quick progress and closing in the gap between the two airlines; for example in May 2012, Virgin carried 1.422 million domestic passengers vis-à-vis 1.371 million by Qantas.

Macro Environment Analysis

The key elements of the wider (Macro) environment of Virgin Australia have been studied in this section by means of a PESTL analysis.

1.     Political, Legal and Technological

a)      Industry deregulation in 1990 has enabled the entry of various low cost airlines into the market. This has left little competitive advantage to players such as Virgin Australia which is facing stiff competition from all corners.
b)      The industry is protected by sovereign rights called ‘freedoms’, providing the players in the industry with certain backing and help from the government (especially in times of crisis when companies need bailing out of financial whirlpools).
c)       Increasing number of customers are utilising the internet (e-ticketing) to secure bookings. This is fast changing the dynamics of distribution in the aviation industry.
d)      Use of technology such as internet and strengthened consumer groups has facilitated price transparency, leaving little scope for airlines to manipulate fares.

2.     Economic and Global

a)      Virgin Australia and the aviation industry in general is extremely sensitive to economic variables such as GDP growth, households’ disposable income and the general business sentiment; as such variables directly affect the consumer’s purchasing power and the underlying costs of the company thus affecting purchase decisions and other business functions.
b)      Of late the oil prices in the international commodity market have been volatile. Forever increasing, the price rise has affected airlines adversely, as fuel is one of the major costs in the aviation industry.
c)       Although Australian GDP has grown but current global economic downturn has left trade and industry in a never ending limbo between growth and crisis. The upward moving interest rates have adversely affected consumer spending thus, affecting sales in the airline sector.
d)      Crisis and competition in domestic markets is pushing companies to find greener pastures overseas. Airlines such as Virgin Australia have launched international services to benefit from expanding into a larger market.

3.     Socio Cultural and Demographic

a)      As population is getting clustered and centred on few urban centres, the number of domestic routes has reduced to a few, with high traffic plying on such routes.
b)      As trade is on the rise, the demands of the business traveller is for more frequent and on time flying schedules. This is a lucrative insight for Virgin Australia which is planning to foray into the government and corporate travel segments.
c)       Increased awareness about environmental impact and the need for conservation (promoted by various interest groups, government and consumers), has motivated the players in the aviation industry to implement steps in the direction of reducing carbon footprint (for example, differentiated take off and landing fees are a step in this direction). 
The use of the PESTL model is limited in providing only a checklist under the headlines included in this model. Analysing change needs a close insight into the issues pointed out in this model. However, it has come to light that the major issues pertaining to Australian aviation industry and that to Virgin Australia in particular are those under the head of Global and Economic forces, and Environmental and Socio Cultural impact.
The current global economic downturn has adversely affected the Australian aviation industry. With rising costs (especially fuel costs which are a major cost component in the aviation industry) has pushed airlines to explore foreign markets for business. Decreasing purchasing power of the consumer and inefficient operations of the airlines has lead many players in the segment into a downward spiral of decreasing profits and market share. However, the air carriers are trying to woo customers by adopting various cost cutting measures to reduce fare prices and adopting environment friendly approaches to spread a positive word about their brand.
Therefore the analysis of various macro environment elements has lead to the understanding of issues facing Virgin Australia and has also helped in attempting to suggest various strategic responses to resolve the problems of the air borne carrier.  

SWOT Analysis

The internal and external environment of Virgin Australia can be analysed meaningfully by the way of a SWOT analysis.

Strengths

1.       Customer Service- Virgin is well known globally for having a ‘fun’ approach to business and keeping customers happy. Virgin Australia toes in line and boasts of a great customer service record, substantiated by various awards it has won for the same.
2.       Fleet of aircrafts- Virgin Australia’s fleet is over 68 aircrafts. These are new machines therefore, relatively easy to maintain and incur less costs.
3.       Distribution- The ticket bookings for the flight are mostly made online, reducing the need for physical transactions.
4.       Flying record- Virgin Australia enjoys a clean flying record, reporting few to none accidents and compliance to rules and regulations. This has encouraged customer’s confidence in the ability of the pilots and machines of Virgin in ensuring safety and rescue.
5.       Punctuality- Virgin has been reported as being on-time than most airlines. On a customer survey, people cited that virgin was punctual 90.5% times as compared to Jetstar which scored 88%.
6.       Innovation- Deriving its core philosophies from Virgin International, Virgin Australia focuses on continual innovation. Initiatives such as that of countering climate change have been a first in the industry.
7.       Strong backing- Virgin Australia is backed by a brand as reputed and strong as Virgin (international). This has not only provided the Australian company a head start in the market but, also considerable potency to take risks, playing on the resources of its international counterpart.

Weakness

1.       Foreign brand- Virgin Australia is not owned by an Australian company hence, it may lose favour from government, customers or other influential groups in the wake of nationalism.
2.       Over dependent on one segment- Virgin Australia depends only on the domestic leisure travel market. No initiatives to diversify in to other segments have left the brand vulnerable to competition.
3.       Declining profits- Virgin Australia’s profitability is declining year by year as a result of rising costs, increased fare prices and stiff competition.

Opportunities

1.       Partnerships- Virgin can secure alliances to expand its network thereby enabling customers to use its services to fly frequently to more destinations. This will not only reduce costs but also bring in additional profits and brand recognition and loyalty from the customers. A 10 year strategic alliance with Sky West is a step in this direction.
2.       New Segments- Virgin Australia is trying to diversify in the government and corporate travel market thus, undermining the share of Qantas and establishing market leadership.
3.       International markets- By catering to international destinations through V Australia, the brands international recognition and long term profits from multiple channels are being secured.
4.       Virgin Australia has signed the Open Skies Aviation agreement, which has benefitted the brand in more ways than one.

 Threats

1.       Competition- Virgin Australia faces stiff competition from Jetstar, Qantas and Tiger airways. This has not only eroded the company’s market share but has also resulted in declining profits. What is toll taking is the fact that Virgin has to fight competition at both ends of the spectrum; that is from low cost carriers as well as full service airlines alike.
2.       Economic Downturn- Virgin Australia is not spared from the global economic crisis. Rising prices of labor, fuel and other costs specific to an airline has adversely affected the financial health of the company. Adding to this strict government regulations have made it even more difficult to operate smoothly.

Strategic Issues

Summing up the analysis one can derive that most of the strategic issues faced by Virgin Australia are interrelated and vested in its inability to figure out a lasting sustainable competitive advantage. This lack of direction in the company’s policy is further reflected in the recent fall in share prices of Virgin Australia.
Mentioned below are two key strategic issues faced by Virgin Australia:

1.     Market Positioning

When it first launched in 2000, Virgin endeavoured to position itself as a low cost carrier; aiming to attract customers by reduced/budget fares for domestic destinations. This positioning was largely attempted to capture the leisure traveller population, and it worked well until Qantas launched Jetstar to cater to the same segment in 2004; and Tiger Airways also positioned itself similarly by launching in 2007. At this juncture, Virgin felt the need to position away from the competition and sought to pursue a new strategy to cater as a full service airline within budget. However, such a strategy could be a dicey one and Virgin may end up being ‘stuck in the middle’ failing to make a mark on either end of the spectrum enabling its competitors to take advantage of the situation and eat into its market share. Also, positioning in such a segment ordains the company to fight competition from either end thus standing a chance to be overwhelmed by the competitor’s strategy.

2.     Challenging economic conditions

It is evident that the world is not performing at its economic best. The rising costs owing to spiralling economic mechanisms and dependency in international trade which has lead to the spread of economic disasters to wider areas far flung from their epicentre. The rise in fuel prices internationally (which are largely controlled by oil cartels in the middle-east and some developed nations) has adversely affected the aviation industry as a whole. Fuel which made 14%-15% of the total cost component earlier constitutes to about 35% of Virgin’s cost currently. This has made it difficult for airlines to keep their prices within check.
A carrier such as Virgin which aims at providing services and quality within a budget is finding it extremely difficult to contain costs and resist from passing on the increase to the end consumer. Also, as households’ disposable income has fallen, ticket sales have dipped. Obviously in times of such crunch a consumer will prefer an airline which transports at the lowest costs (even minus the services) hence, Virgin’s positioning in such a climate is becoming vulnerable both at the hands of the competition as well as the economic climate in the country.

Recommendations

Given the strategic issues faced by Virgin Australia, in this section we attempt to provide strategic alternatives that Virgin may choose to incorporate in order to mitigate the adverse circumstances it faces at the hand of competitors and economic climate.
1.       Cost Price Leadership- Under this strategy it is suggested that Virgin should again size down to the low fare/budget travel segment. Owing to the company’s long standing expertise in the segment it would be wise if the company repositions back to the old setting. This move will involve centralisation or outsourcing of service facilities as call centres, reducing the ‘value added services’ it currently offers as part of the ‘new world carrier’ strategy, downward revising of employees salary, improving technology to incur efficiencies and focus on control measure to contain costs.
If Virgin could regain such efficiencies it earlier had, it can easily take over competitors such as Jetstar.
However, the cost price leadership strategy is not without disadvantages. Positioning in a segment on the basis of price can lead to price wars among competitors, especially when it has become easier to enter the air travel business (after deregulation) and new entrants find the low fare segment easier to establish base. Also, operating in the budget segment always requires a strict control on costs which is becoming increasing difficult in adverse economic conditions; this can have an adverse effect on profitability of low cost carriers.

2.       Focus Strategy- under focus strategy, Virgin will be required to continually improve its services In order to compete in the full service airline market. This can be advantageous to Virgin and require minimum effort as Virgin already has a focus on customer satisfaction and continual innovation to delight the passengers. Also, this market has very less competition, Qantas being the only major competitor in this segment. It is to be noted that Virgin is already closing the gap with Qantas and is steadily gaining market acceptance by consistent focus on customer satisfaction and is gaining entry into newer market segments such as corporate and business travellers.
However, following such a strategy is not without problems. Maintaining budget prices and providing quality services at the same time is a behemoth task to handle, especially in the face of rising costs. Increased ticket fares in times when net disposable incomes have decreased and consumers are less willing to shell out money, can spell a death knell for all frill air carriers. If Virgin is to tread this path, it must do so with utmost caution taking into account all possible factors which can turn off consumers in the given economic setting.

3.       Differentiation strategy- This strategy requires Virgin to position on the basis of special qualities of the brand and its unique image. The Virgin brand portrays an image of a fun and innovative brand focusing on customer delight and this is well known among its target market. However, it may be noted that an average customer may not be willing to pay an additional cost for this uniqueness of the brand. But, it is also to be noted that the unique culture at Virgin has fostered an environment which is conducive to employee motivation, training and retention, ensuring employees deliver their best to the customer (this has also resulted in certain efficiencies in terms of reduced hiring costs and staff performing at their optimal best). Such a unique culture if catered at control prices will surely enthral customers and help in securing their loyalty. Virgin can even think on the lines of integrating such a strategy with its current ‘new world carrier’ positioning.

Deducing from the above suggested courses, the researcher would suggest Virgin to embrace the differentiation strategy. Operating in the cost price leadership market is fraught with competition and the focus strategy may land the company in a financially unreasonable position. However, the differentiation strategy manages the best of both worlds – catering a unique nurturing, innovative and fun environment which is positioned at total customer delight while meeting the budget expectations of the end consumer will surely capture the attention of the target market and the loyalty of the user.  

Conclusion

The report has been material in studying the macro and micro environment of Virgin Australia. This has enabled the researcher to critically analyse the strategic issues facing the brand, which are impeding its growth and sustainability. The problem discovered through such an analysis is that of positioning and gearing up for economic upheavals in the world economy. Certain plausible alternatives have been provided to help mitigate such strategic issues and it is suggested that Virgin continues to build upon its current strategy to build a differentiated position in the market.
The researcher hopes, by following the recommendations posted in this paper, Virgin is able to secure a sustainable competitive edge in the market it operates in.

References

4.       AJNRR Consulting, Virgin Blue Holdings, A Strategic Analysis
Prepared by: Andy Ley, Joachim Brastein, Nathan Westgarth, Rishi Dave, Ron Stanley
5.       Blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2012/08/28/virgin-australia-says-its-game-on-with-qantasjetstar/
6.       www.ausbt.co.au/qantas-vs-virgin-australia-how-satisfied-are -you
9.       www.flyertalk.com
10.   finance.ninemsn.com.au/pfmanagingmoney/spending/8124440/virgin-blue-versus-jetstar-which-is-better-value


Lady Gaga Case Study

Case Background and Introduction
Gone are the days when an artist could solely thrive on his/her artistic prowess to win the hearts of the audiences. Modern artists have to go the extra mile in addition to their artistic abilities to reach out to potential fans and appreciators. This paper focuses on analysing the role of strategic management in kick starting the career of an artist, in the age of ever changing technology and ever growing clutter of choices available to people.
We will consider the case of musician, Lady Gaga for the purpose of this paper; and try to trace key events in the artist’s life and study probable outcomes of alternatives available at that particular juncture in Gaga’s career.
The event of choice here took place in 2009, when Lady Gaga was gearing up for a multi month tour with rapper Kanye West. The tour was a big ticket event and a first of its kind in Gaga’s musical journey. The artist aimed at jump starting her career with such an event by associating with a popular name as Kanye West thus, assuring returns and getting leverage for her promotional efforts by banking on the image of someone already popular.
Problem struck Gaga camp when West withdrew from participating in the tour, a month short of the release due date for the event. And although Lady Gaga and her manager Tony Carter were aware of the unprofessional behaviour sported by West at events such as MTV music awards, they could do little in winning West back to favour.
 Tony Carter and other associates of Lady Gaga team such as, Steve Berman (Vice Chairman of Interscope Geffen A&M), Arthur Fogel (CEO of Live Nation’s Global Touring), William Morris (of Endeavor), producer Vincent Herbert, organisations such as L.A. Reid (Lady Gaga’s record producer), Atom Factory, Live Nation and Coalition Media, came together to mitigate a solution to the sudden problem. The problem was of choice that is, choosing the best possible alternative in the situation, as a damage control (loss minimising) measure, which least sacrifices the artist’s potential for stardom.

Situation Analysis

In September, 2009 the problem facing team Lady Gaga, had only three obvious alternative solutions;

1.     Flat out cancellation of the event

This was the simplest alternative available to Tony Carter. Cancelling any performances would kill the prospects of any losses that were to be made on the failure of a multimillion tour. However, this would have also meant quitting chances of any probable profit. Also, cancelling shows and not performing isn’t healthy for an artist’s career; an artist must continually strive to reach out to newer audiences.

2.     Resizing to smaller venues

Lady Gaga had already been performing in night clubs and for smaller audiences; it was more in her comfort zone and the risk appetite required for such performances is low. For a team if it has, lower risk propensity, it suited well to scale down the event to smaller venues for solo performances by the artist.

3.     Giving ‘it’ a shot

The last and the most risky option available with team Lady Gaga was to let Lady Gaga perform solo on the big ticket arena tour. This would have been a first for the singer, and had high chances of making her the star she yearned to be. Also, if the event failed, it could bring along multimillion losses and a tarnished brand image.
Making a choice from the three alternatives available required a structured and detailed analysis of the situation to make the best decision. In the following section we will undertake a brief SWOT analysis to best determine the factors influencing the situation and how it could lead to the best possible alternative.

Strength

The pop star’s strength lies in three core areas:

1.      Musical connect

With three chart topping numbers in her first album ‘The Fame’, Gaga had easily developed connect with her audience. Moreover her musical prowess was established by her winning various prestigious awards in the music fraternity.

2.      Fashion Statement

Lady Gaga created a buzz around her image in the media and among the audiences, with her outré fashion sense. Her dressing up in a dress made of red meat earned her the title of top fashion statement of 2010 (TIME magazine).

3.      Professional backing

Lady Gaga is backed by producer such as Vincent Herbert and record labels such as streamline records. Good professional backing has ensured a sound music career and promotion for the artist.

Weakness

There were two points of weakness manifest in team Gaga:

1.      Lack of experience

Gaga had just started making her mark on the musical scene. It had only been a year for Lady Gaga performing at night clubs and for private audiences; and opening tour for reunion of band ‘New kids on the block’. She lacked exposure to big crowds as against lot of establish stars.

2.      Still evolving fan base

As lady Gaga was very new to the music scene, her fan base was still developing. There was no surety in terms of estimated of numbers, of how many people would turn up for the scheduled event.

Opportunities

Lady Gaga has done a commendable job at creating an opportunity for her brand, herself.

1.      Social media

Gaga is among the few celebrities who have been articulate to use the social media to their advantage. Gaga personally manages her facebook and twitter accounts to develop a personal connect with her fans.

2.      Digital team

Lady Gaga employs a special digital team to maintain a repository of her online feeds and to synchronise promotional, publicity and outreach efforts across all digital platforms. Efforts to arrange interviews by media bloggers, videos on Youtube, Cross linking and cross promotion are some of the remarkable achievements of the digital team, in building brand Lady Gaga.

Threats

Threats to the singer come from two corners (and these threats are common to the entire music industry):

1.      Other artists

The rise of new pop artists and the popularity of already established ones have the prospect of eating into the fan base of Lady Gaga. The team needs to stay ahead both in music quality and promotion to fight against such a threat.

2.      Dynamic Technology

Technology in the past decade has evolved faster than the speed of thought and developing still faster than ever. This has however, adversely affected the artists in the music industry. Ever changing technology has left less means to the artists to earn. Music listeners these days directly download a song from the internet (for free), eating into the artists commission (which would otherwise come had the listener bought a CD or a cassette).

Recommendation

A study of the strengths of the brand, its weakness, opportunities available and the threats facing the singer have given a clearer picture of the situation enabling a sound decision making process.
In my view, Tony Carter should advise Lady Gaga to perform solo at the multimillion tour about to kick off in a month. Reason being:
1.       Lady Gaga’s musical prowess is already established among her fans and music fraternity. She has even won quite many prestigious awards giving further proof of the same. 
2.       Lady Gaga has been able to develop a personal connect with the audience through her music and her unusual fashion sense. She has been able to attract ever growing number of fans due to her eccentric attitude.
3.       This opportunity can be a once in a lifetime opportunity to make it big. Sitting and doing nothing is not going to do any good to her career; and in the past the team has seen negligible revenues and futility of small scale events.

In my opinion Lady Gaga has all the prospects of becoming a star. She is backed by ability, attitude and sound business principles; therefore, she should take a chance to take a big leap, the risk is calculated and she has good chances of making the event a total sold out!

Lady Gaga Case

Introduction
This case study analysis report will shed some light on the use of Strategic marketing initiatives in the creative industries. Specifically, this case studies the meteoric rise of Lady Gaga, from just a supporting act on the re-union tour of the boy band of yester years New Kids on the Block in 2008, to virtually the biggest celebrity on planet earth.
The successful career graph of the pop star Lady Gaga is not the product of mere chance. Rather, such success can be attributed to the dexterity and managing prowess of the team that manages the brand Lady Gaga. Primarily this team consists of Lady Gaga’s manager Tony Carter. However, people such as Steve Berman (Vice Chairman of Interscope Geffen A&M), Arthur Fogel (CEO of Live Nation’s Global Touring), William Morris (of Endeavor) and producer Vincent Herbert also played a crucial role in making Gaga the star she is. Also, organisations such as L.A. Reid (Lady Gaga’s record producer), Atom Factory, Live Nation and Coalition Media were critical in promoting the pop star.
The turning point in Gaga’s life came when she was at the cross roads in life, confused between taking a shot at it or, rather rethink her plans. In fall of 2009, Lady Gaga was set to hit the road for her first multi-month arena tour co-headlined by famous rapper Kanye West. Gaga being relatively new to the music industry with only about a year’s experience in live performance and recording, the tour was so designed that Gaga could piggy back on the reputation of Kanye West, making it safe for her investors and stake holders to make money through her brand, simultaneously also promoting the pop star.
The situation got tricky when Kanye West backed out a month before the tour was scheduled to start. Although ‘team Lady Gaga’ had some intuition about Kanye West’s unprofessionalism (deducing from his bullying Taylor Swift at the MTV music award on September 13 the same year), his backing off at the last moment was the last nail in the coffin confirming the team’s doubt about his ethics.  
The problem facing Tony Carter at that point in time was to decide between various alternatives. He knew well that big ticket arena events could mean big money however; the risk involved was also great since it would have been a first for Lady Gaga. Carter could choose from alternatives such as cancelling the tour altogether or, rescheduling dates, venues (hiring smaller ones) and ticket prices (reducing them) so as to better suit Gaga’s comfort levels and minimise the chances for losses.
It is at this juncture, we step into Carter’s shoes and try to analyse the situation and give our inputs and suggestions based on this review.

Situation Analysis and Determining Alternatives

Before we delve into studying alternatives present to Tony Carter regarding the first solo tour of Lady Gaga, and pour over our recommendations regarding the same; it will be beneficial to study the Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats facing the ‘brand’ Lady Gaga to get a clear picture of the issue.

Strengths

Lady Gaga has had 3 super hit music numbers under her album ‘The Fame’. She is also signed by the very famous producer Vincent Herbert of Streamline records. For a musician it is of key importance to get his/her music appreciated and accepted by the masses in order to achieve the status of a pop star. Lady Gaga has been very successful in this by developing connect with her audience through her music. This is backed by the fact that a very reputed label has backed her endeavours by agreeing to produce and record her music and market it subsequently.
Another weapon in Gaga’s arsenal is her outré fashion sense and eccentric attitude which has caught the attention of the media and audiences alike. In 2010 she was rated as making the top fashion statement by the TIME magazine and in 2011 she held the Guiness World Record for being the most searched female on the internet.

Weakness

The core weakness in Lady Gaga’s case was a lack of experience. Being a new comer and almost a year old (at max) she lagged behind artists who had wide exposure in performing to multitudes of 20000 plus fans.
The only experience in Lady Gaga’s kitty was opening up for the reunion tour of an old boy band, New Kids on the Block (2008); and often singing in the Night Clubs. However, there was no real exposure in playing at big ticket events.
Also the expected turn up of Gaga’s fans at such a large scale event was not known as she was too new to the music scene and her fan base was still in the initial evolutionary phase. Adding to this ‘brand Gaga’ had already done a ‘not-so-profitable’ small scale event in the recent past.

Opportunities

Lady Gaga has been a leader in celebrity social networking. She has used platforms such as Twitter and Facebook to develop a personal connect with her fan base. Essence of the activity is that she personally manages her social networking profiles, giving such social activity a personal touch and strict quality control. Social Networking in recent times has proven an effective brand promotion tool. Even ‘brand Gaga’ stands to benefit from such early bird efforts.
Lady Gaga also utilises a Digital Team, the responsibility of which, is to synchronise her promotional and brand building efforts across all digital platforms – such as press releases, behind the scene movies on Youtube and  interviews with media bloggers among others.
Being a first mover in this space, Gaga stands to benefit from the growing influence of technology.

Threats

 There are two major threats to the brand Lady Gaga. Firstly, she has to differentiate herself from the growing numbers of pop artists and already established stars by capturing fan bases through her musical ability and promotional efforts. Threat is posed by stars who already have established fan groups and presence on the music scene.
The second threat comes from the ever evolving technology, making it difficult for artists to earn solely through their music. Since, music these days can be easily downloaded from the internet, the artist has to forego his/her royalty.
Gauging from the SWOT analysis of brand Lady Gaga, following alternatives are suggested to resolve the problem faced by Tony Carter:

1.     Cancel the Show/Tour

Tony Carter and Lady Gaga can decide to cancel the entire event altogether. Saving from any losses (and also from any profits!)

2.     Reschedule for smaller venues

Lady Gaga and team can redesign and reschedule the event for smaller venues (at reduced prices) since this is more in the comfort zone of Gaga and the team knows through experience how to handle such small scale events and can almost accurately predict revenues from such events. However, small events will mean probability of small revenue and also less chances of Gaga shooting it to fame.

3.     Continue solo on the big ticket event

This is the most risky proposition however, also the most profitable one in prospects. It can be the deal maker for Gaga’s pending success as a celebrity star. Only thing holding Gaga from taking a plunge in this direction is her lack of experience in performing in front of an arena full of audience.

Conclusion and Recommendations

 Gauging the situation and taking in account the factors influencing the position of brand and team Lady Gaga, my suggestion would be to continue the big ticket tour, solo. Following are the reasons to supports such a recommendation:
1.       Lady Gaga’s music and outfits has already caught the fancies of media and her audience alike. Making her popularity grown not only for her music but also for her attitude.
2.       She has won the titles of best new comer, and best music direction (among others) at various prestigious award functions establishing her as an artist of repute in the music community.
3.       Cancelling and not doing any shows will hold her career at a standstill.
4.       Rescheduling for smaller venues has not been profitable in the past and it also limits her potential as an artist who is capable of reaching the masses.

Thus team Gaga should have the confidence and take the plunge, trusting Gaga’s music ability and her enigma (perceived by the fans), the tour should be a sold out event.

Thursday, 25 September 2014

TruEarth Healthy Foods: Market Research for a New Product Introduction

Introduction
1980s saw an increasing account of dual income households in America. With mothers, wives and sisters working out of homes to contribute towards the family income for a better lifestyle; there was also the incidence of ‘time poverty’ with less time remaining to cook meals at home. DeRosa founder of TruEarth started the company to take advantage of the opportunity and sell ready to eat healthy gourmet meals to the rising middle class.
TruEarth launched Cucina Fresca, its gourmet pasta range which was an instant hit in the market. It now deliberates over launching a healthy ready to eat pizza range. Given the market size of $4.4 billion of this particular category, launching the pizza offering is quite lucrative to TruEarth. However, it has to be careful in choosing the right course of action by taking into account, reception by the prospective customer and the strategies of its various competitors in this segment.

Problem Analysis

The estimated size of pizza market in the USA is about $53 billion (2007). Of this two thirds of the turnover comes from restaurants, deliveries and take aways. Just about 11% which is approximately $4.4 billion from the total turnover, comes from the refrigerated pizza sales. This is the segment TruEarth is eyeing. However, as players such as Nestle and Kraft already have presence in the segment with their low cost offering and a close competitor Rigazzi is gearing up to launch a similar product as TruEarth’s, focus of TruEarth is on coming up with a pizza which is not only rightly priced but is also healthy and tastes good.
 TruEarth can take over this segment by simply materialising on the fact that most pizza consumers do not want to cut on their pizza consumption. Almost 33% have expressed that they’d want a pizza offering which is healthier than the usual pizza. Hence the need gap is quite obvious and moving at the right time can bring huge profits to the company.

Problem Statement

Thus, gauging from the situation, TruEarth’s problem is deciding between two proposed ways to proceed. That is, either to capitalise on a first mover’s advantage with its unique offering or to wait for Rigazzi to take the first step and then follow it afterwards.

Alternatives

The alternatives present in this case are two and our explained below:
1.       The first option is to gain on a first mover’s advantage; taking the market by storm and establishing a substantial market share by aggressive marketing.  
2.       The second option is to launch after Rigazzi and gain a better idea of how the market is likely to react to the offering by TruEarth. This is a safer approach if TruEarth is unsure of the results of the various researches it conducted.

Recommendation

The best approach for TruEarth will to launch first and take the first mover’s advantage. The company has already successfully launched Cucina Fresca on the basis of Nielsen BASE research method; and if the results of the study are to be believed for this new offering than surely TruEarth should kaunch first and capture the market.
The company needs only about $12 million of sales revenue to break even in the first year. As the survey and studies point out that, even if the product turns out to be mediocre the revenues will be approximately $14.5 million in the first year. If the product turns out to be excellent, TruEarth may see approximate total revenue of $22.6 million. Thus, the company gains in either case, should the product turn out to be mediocre or excellent.

Conclusion

The case analysis has been successful as far as arriving at the best possible solution to the problem is concerned. However, it is recommended for the managers at TruEarth to double check the results of various studies conducted under the Nielsen BASE method. Also, corrective measures should be taken according to the knowledge unearthed about consumer preferences (such as making crust less chewy and making the pizza reasonably priced). Lastly managers should endeavour to find out about the attitudes and trend in markets other than the high potential ones to have a clearer understanding of the product’s appeal and its prospect of gaining a sizeable market share and penetration.           


TruEarth Healthy Foods: Market Research for a New Product Introduction

Introduction
The late 1980s saw a growing demand for healthy, gourmet food products vis-à-vis mass produced highly processed food. The trend of dual income households where homemakers were eventually coming out to earn for a better lifestyle was on the rise. However this trend also implied that there was increasing time poverty at the hands of a usual household to prepare meals at home. Hence, there was also the incident of increasing guilt among mothers and wives who were not able to provide healthy home cooked meals to their family. DeRosa started TruEarth to capitalise on this opportunity of providing ready to eat healthy gourmet preparations to these growing dual income households.
In 2006, Eckstein a brand manager at TruEarth spearheaded the launch of a new product line Cucina Fresca, under which fresh whole grain pasta meal kits were promoted. Although a break even sales of only 12 million $ was required in the first year (to meet the advertising, promotional and other costs), the product brought a total revenue of 18 million $ in the first year and 35 million $ in the second year. By far it was one of the most successful launches in the company’s history. However, sales began to drop as competitors such as Rigazzi, Nestle and Kraft geared up in promoting similar products. However, sustaining its first mover advantage and sizeable market share, TruEarth is thinking on the lines of launching a unique healthy pizza offering.
Pizzas are a prime menu option in the Italian-American food category. With over $53 billion in estimated annual sales in 2007, Pizza is one of the most lucrative food categories for a player like TruEarth. The store-bought Pizza market estimates to around 11% of this $53 billion market and stands around $4.4 billion in sales (2007). However, Pizza sales in recent years have been hit by rising health concerns and popularity of diets which restrict unhealthy food intakes. TruEarth intends to capitalise on this opportunity by introducing a healthy pizza option since it has been observed as a result of various surveys that the target population craves for pizza although it wants them to be ‘healthy’ too. Also, little modification is needed to the existing infrastructure to produce the new product. This provides a positive impetus to monetize on the opportunity at hand.

Situation and Problem Analysis

As stated earlier the estimated size of the American pizza market in 2007 was around $53 billion out of which two thirds of the pizza sales came from delivery, take outs and restaurants. Only 11% of the total revenue came from store bought refrigerated pizza, which equals to around $4.4 billion in sales. This is the segment of interest to TruEarth. However, TruEarth competes with the likes of Nestle, Kraft and Rigazzi for a share in this market. As pointed out by Rosie Carlton (Director of business development at TruEarth) success of the pizza range will depend on delivering a crust as good as a take-out pizza; as Kraft and Nestle already have low priced pizza offering in the market.
TruEarth also has to compete for space in consumer preferences for options such as restaurants, deliveries and take-away.
The major opportunity for TruEarth comes from the fact that people don’t want to cut out on their pizza consumption and also want a healthier option – with 33% restaurant goers citing a strong interest in healthy crusts, in a survey. Although certain pizzerias in metropolitans offer whole wheat or multi grain crusts, opportunity exists for providing a pizza fresher than frozen pizza, healthier than take away and one which allows consumer to modify taste suitably, to give that special home cooked feel. Hope is provided by the fact produced by a mall intercept survey, which shows how people are willing to change to TruEarth pizza consumption in subsequent eating pizza eating occasions as compared to previous pizza eating occasions.
Stated below is a brief SWOT analysis to arrive at the core problem at hand:

Strengths

The core strength of this proposition lies in the fact that firstly, the offering is going to be a nutritious and healthy one, and close to substitutes such as fresh home cooked meals. Secondly, by providing the options for various toppings flexibility has been provided to the consumer to mould the product according to individual tastes. Lastly, 30% of the population which favoured TruEarth (determined in various surveys and research initiatives) stated that no improvements were needed to the offering designed by the company; this was a positive indicator since 30% of the population is a large part of the market targeted.

Weakness

It was determined that the Pizza offering by TruEarth would feed only 2-3 people. Also, 29% of the population participating in home trials concluded that the price needed to be revised downwards. When compared to pricing by restaurants and take away, the prices were still high. So conclusively there was a need to reduce the prices in order to appeal to the pockets of the target consumer. Also a requisite product modification found in the surveys was that around 7% of the population in favour wanted the crust to be less chewy; also 20% of the population which was unfavourable cited the same change in the crust.

Opportunities

There are only three main opportunities with regards to launching the pizza. Firstly, the market’s size itself ($53 billion out of which 11% is the core target market for TruEarth). Secondly, the fact that the American consumer does not want to cut out on Pizza consumption and still rising awareness about health concerns and ill effects of available pizza options is making the consumer crave for a healthier pizza meal. Almost 33% of population on a survey ‘strongly desired’ a healthy pizza meal option. Thirdly, the real opportunity lies in providing an option healthier than take away (or restaurants) and fresher than frozen pizza, and one which is pocket friendly too.

Threats

 TruEarth faces some serious threats concerning its pizza product launch intentions. One of the major threats concerning the proposition comes from the likes of Nestle and Kraft, which already have low cost frozen pizza preparations in the market. To counter these TruEarth need to have real good crust which matches that of take out. Second threat comes from Rigazzi which is one of the closest competitor of TruEarth and is planning to launch a similar offering as TruEarth’s very soon. The problem facing the company in this regard is the pressure to capitalise on a first mover’s advantage or toe in line with Rigazzi as the leader. The last of threats, manifests itself in the lack of an in depth study of the situation. Since the research and study has been conducted in high potential markets only, a fair idea of true market penetration and reception of the product cannot be gauged from these studies.

Problem Statement

Summing up from the above, TruEarth’s problem with regard to the new product proposition, is essentially of choice and lies in the pressure to either act swiftly and gain a first mover’s advantage over Rigazzi; or, to launch after Rigazzi, and lose on the first mover advantage but gain on insight.

Alternative courses of action

If we study the nature of the problem itself, the alternative courses of action are quite evident in the statement of the problem. The alternatives present in this case are two and our explained below:
1.       The first alternative present is to launch before Rigazzi and gain a first mover’s advantage. The benefits of this approach will be that launching first will provide better time to TruEarth to penetrate the market properly and establish hold before other players come in (this first move is also to be teamed up with aggressive marketing efforts for desired effects). The advantages of launching first have been enjoyed by TruEarth in success of Cucina Fresca.
2.       A second alternative is to launch after Rigazzi’s pizza offering launch. This will provide TruEarth with a better and realistic insight into market trends with regards to the proposed product. Hence, TruEarth will be in a better position to modify according to market needs or take pre-emptive steps in this regard. This should be the alternative of choice, if TruEarth is doubtful about the appeal of its offering or is not satisfied or fully convinced by the research Nielsen has undertaken.

Recommended Course of Action

I would recommend TruEarth to take a first mover’s advantage in launching its pizza offering. The company has already seen the advantages of moving first in case of its pasta offering Cucina Fresca.
Being a niche product present due to a clearly defined opportunity of a demand for healthy ready to eat meals, it suits TruEarth better to launch first and capture market share by Gorilla marketing efforts to guard itself against biggies such as Nestle and Kraft. Should it choose to penetrate into markets already held by Nestle, Kraft and the likes, it will find itself in deep trouble since competitors as Nestle can easily oust competition by huge marketing budgets and influence in the localities they operate in.
Also, one must pay attention to the results of various research findings unearthed by Nielsen’s Base I and II method:
The company needs only about $12 million of sales revenue to break even in the first year. As the survey and studies point out that, even if the product turns out to be mediocre the revenues will be approximately $14.5 million in the first year (the consumer’s taste and other buying preferences have been studied thoroughly in various surveys and studies so a reasonable estimate about the mediocrity or excellence of the product can be made).
If the product turns out to be excellent, TruEarth may see approximate total revenue of $22.6 million.
So in both the cases (mediocre or excellent) the revenue is higher than what the company needs to break even in the first year. Hence, gaining on the first mover’s advantage should be the preferred course of action in this case.

Conclusion


Concluding from the case study analysis by way of studying the situation, determining the problem and analysing the available alternatives, we have been able to recommend a course of action that should be taken by the company. However, it would do good to the managers at TruEarth to carefully study and analyse the BASE research findings in context of the proposition made, to take pre-emptive action to modify the offering on the basis of consumer feedbacks in various surveys (such as making crust less chewy and making the pizza reasonably priced) and to find out about the attitudes and trend in markets other than the high potential ones to have a clearer understanding of the product’s appeal and its prospect of gaining a sizeable market share and penetration.