Thursday, 25 September 2014

Managing Under Uncertainty

Introduction

In times of rapid globalization, technological advancements, increasing cut throat competition, shortened product lifecycles and volatility in international markets and politics, among others, it is becoming of chief importance for managers to take the right decision to save organizations from bad image and losses. However, managers are often unable to make a perfectly rational decision due to various factors affecting the decision making process. For example, the limitations of manager’s own cognitive process, use of satisficing techniques in decision making process, lack of availability of proper information or difficulty in filtering through cumbersome overload of information, thereby often making the decisions arrived at – a victim of bounded rationality.
In this particular paper we will study some of the decisions taken by the management at the Hyundai Motors in context of the Indian market, using the approach of bounded rationality to analyze the decision making process.

Problem Statement

Mid 2012 Hyundai launched the new variant of the Hyundai Sonata in the Indian market, especially India, where the company has a strong hold (cited as the second biggest Indian car manufacturer after Maruti Suzuki) However, the car failed to make the cash registers jingles and Hyundai is since seeing ever dropping sales of the model and even planning to pull out the model from the market to save from further losses.
The decision to launch the fluidic sonata was made by the top management at Hyundai Motors India. The decision may have been influenced by the remarkable success of the Fluidic Verna model launched by the company in 2011 and the remarkable success of Hyundai Sonata in the USA market.
However the model failed to attract customers due to rising fuel prices and lack of brand presence in the D segment in the Asian market. Therefore the outcome of the decision has been quite disastrous and unprofitable for the company.

Analyzing the decision making process

Soon after launching in 2000, within the span of a decade, Hyundai Motors India Limited became the second largest car manufacturer in the country. With ever increasing car sales and successful launches one after the other the top management’s confidence in the Indian market increased as they geared up to invest more in manufacturing facilities and marketing costs incurred in the country. In 2011, the company launched a new model of the Hyundai Verna (which was already present in the market), based on its new fluidic design philosophy. The model was an instant hit among the Indian customers and this gave an encouragement to the management to think on similar lines aligning future launches with the same philosophy. In Mid 2012, Hyundai Motors India launched the Sonata Fluidic model in the Indian market. However the segment D car priced ex showroom (New Delhi) at Rupees 18.5 lakhs failed to attract any takers.
The sales figures of the car have been the following:
1.       32 units in July 2012
2.       39 units in June 2012
3.       43 units in May 2012
4.       66 units in April 2012
5.       92 units in March 2012
The ever declining dismal figures are the result of 3 key factors which the decision makers failed to take in account:
1.       The car is offered in 2.0 L and 2.4 L petrol variant only. Diesel engine option is not available.
2.       Fuel prices are on the rise in India and petrol rates are at prohibitive highs in the country. Customer in the Indian market prefers Diesel cars over petrol to save cost.
3.       The company has little presence in the segment D market; with Hyundai Elantra as the only car apart from Sonata in this segment (which too is not selling very well).
The theories of bounded rationality can make a reasonable attempt to explain the failure of Hyundai’s management to make an optimal decision when launching Sonata Fluidic. The decision in relation to the concept of bounded rationality is explained below:
1.       Application of Heuristics without supplementary factual information- Hyundai Motors has had a remarkable success story of Hyundai Sonata in the North American market where almost 2,00,000 copies of the car sold in the first year of launch (2011). Also, the Hyundai Verna Fluidic had magnificent sales volume in the Indian market in the same year. The top management must have picked cue from this experience of success. However, what lacked in their decision making approach is linking of Heuristics with factual information and situational analysis before making a generalization to a wider or different environment. In this case the company evidently, did not study the Indian situation well before launching. The selective perception shown by the managers by ignoring critical information such as rise in fuel prices and not making appropriate promotional strategies for a segment its weak in (segment D) resulted in a poor launch.

2.       Limited Cognitive Ability- The top management has committed two grave mistakes while deciding to launch the Hyundai Sonata. Firstly, they tried to generalize the success of Verna Fluidic to the launch of Sonata ignoring the fact that the two cars belong to two different segments and the fact that Verna is available as a diesel option as well. Secondly the management committed a mistake by ignoring the need for an insight into the conditions prevailing in the Indian market. With the country’s rising middle class ever burdened by increasing fuel prices (especially petrol) and the recent volatility in the economy and financial markets has left little money with Indian households to spare for luxury. Hence, limited cognitive ability and selective perception on part of the management has lead to poor sales of the luxury petrol guzzler.

3.       Unavailability of objective information and Structural Limitations- Hyundai does not have any diesel variants for Sonata all around the world. Although the company is working on a four cylinder diesel engine which can be fitted in the Sonata as well but currently there are no such options. Hence, Hyundai Motors India Limited did not have any choice but to launch the petrol variant only. Also, in a market as complex as India, it is difficult to obtain objective information about demographics, trends and consumer attitudes, this makes it all the more difficult to arrive at an optimally rational solution.

Given the three limitations and failures in the decision making process, the top management made its best attempt at arriving at a satisficing (or reasonable) solution (rather than an optimal one).

Alternative Course of Action

Given the analysis of the decision making process that ended up in a disaster for Hyundai Motors India Limited, I’d suggest two possible alternatives that the management could have undertaken (had it been aware of the concept of bounded rationality).
First, the company could’ve withheld from launching the car until the diesel variant being ready or fuel prices stabilize. Second alternative would have required the company to consider the following points before launching:
1.       Supplementing Heuristics with market trend information- True that Sonata has had a remarkable success in the American market but, attention must also be paid to the reasons behind this success. With rising fuel prices being a concern around the globe, Sonata an entry level segment D car, carves itself a niche by having looks which are match to any premium sedan such as a Jaguar hence being a value proposition to any status conscious buyer. The Indian middle class has a tendency for conspicuous consumption and is akin to demonstration effect. Marketing the car as a value for money ‘big luxury car’ could have turned tables in the Indian market.
2.       Factual Information- Top management should’ve invested in securing reliable factual information about its target market. This could’ve been done by way of a specialized research agency or by collecting information from databases present with the various dealerships of the company. Data about consumer’s willingness to spend, expectations from a car, financial status, risk propensity and brand preferences would’ve gone a long way in determining the best approach to place the product.
3.       Creative Response- Had the management accepted and acknowledged the fact that the brand has a lack of visibility in the segment (Sonata stands in), it could have initiated promotional strategies to make itself ‘present and preferable’. Hyundai has already won the heart of the Indian consumer with its small cars and midsized sedans, it wouldn’t have taken much effort on part of the company’s creative agency to communicate the same picture of efficiency, reliability and trust to the target consumer’s mind. Creative responses could’ve been made to communicate the value and status proposition of the offering thereby negating the petrol variant only issue and bringing the company’s presence in the segment D to limelight.

Conclusion

The case of Hyundai Motor India Limited has been very helpful in shedding light over the issue of bounded rationality which often clots and clogs the decision making process in critical scenarios in day to day management.
Managers although always pressed for time in this ever changing volatile business landscape, need to make the ‘right decisions’ on basis of little information. This makes the task of the manager all the more challenging. It is of critical importance to managers to have awareness of the concepts and working of bounded rationality in order to safeguard their decision making processes from biases and to identify environments which are unsupportive of healthy decision making. Summing up, awareness and practice are the only two feasible solutions to save from the adverse effects of implementing satisficing solutions provided by bounded rationality.

References


2.       International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 1 (2) (2012) 53-66 ©Science Publishing Corporation www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJBAS Application of Rationality in Strategic Decision Making and its Implementation at Branch level: A Case Study of Habib Bank Limited (HBL) Karachi Ghulam Ali Mashori1, Aftab Ahmed2, Manzoor Ali3 Nadir Ali4 1,3Department of Management Sciences, BUITEMS, Quetta











12.   http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/02/18/hyundai-kia-us-auto-sales-soar/

Media and Social Engagement Plan

Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to study the process of churning out an effective PR campaign aimed at launching a product. The specific product in context of which the study is made, is the smart phone Samsung Galaxy S 4; due to be launched in the UK market in 2013.
The report will aim at providing a creative as well as strategic solution to the technology brand, by taking into consideration its potential market, brand image and closest competitors.
The probable lessons from this exercise will be derived in sheer understanding of the dynamics that rule the management of public relations in modern organisations.  

Key Factors Influencing Plan Strategy 

Identify target audiences

The target market for smart phones such as  in the UK is an age group between 22-52 year olds, who are relatively financially independent and belong to the middle class (or other high income groups). Such a segment may or may not be particularly geeky but is definitely technologically aware. This target group is one which closely follows technological advances, as such developments affect this group the most; as the members of this target group are always connected through technology and their work life and social interaction often rests on technology. These people often find affiliation in owning the smartest tech products.

Identify target media

Public Relation strategists have long realised that a particular product is not for everyone; hence, when we design the campaign for Samsung S4, due care is taken to select the media (both online and offline), which caters specifically to our target audience. The choice of media in this case is directly derived from the lifestyle choices of the target consumer. Since the potential buyer spends hours in front of the screen researching consumer experiences on technology blogs such as zath and electric pig or discussing the same on Facebook, use of such media cannot be ruled out. Offline media like technology and lifestyle magazines, and mass consumption newspapers, radio and broadcast mediums such as television news will be effective.

Develop story angle

It is of prime importance to create a story which the media finds relevant to be reported and the audience finds exciting enough that it captures its attention. The story around Samsung S4 should create a buzz for the product and build excitement and anticipation for the product launch. The story should be powerful enough to communicate a glimpse of the offerings of the product yet be able to keep the audience guessing. It should also follow an unbiased factual approach so the media can easily accept it as information of relevance rather than plain advertising.

Devise key messages

The key or the core message of the public relations activity should be the same across all mediums. In case of Samsung the suggested message for the campaign should be on the lines of ‘a new revolution’ – it should communicate the idea of the next big thing. The war between phone companies on the basis of technological specifications is passé; almost all offerings in the market have identical specs for about the same price. The next generation phones as  will fight on the basis of technological innovations rather than specifications and price.

Identify key influencers

Studies have shown that people tend to be influenced more by people rather than TV screens and Billboards. This is especially true in case of technology products where one would rather consider the advice of a ‘techie’ friend than an advertising commercial. Therefore, it becomes critical to have a plan that focuses on educating and impressing such influencers who play a critical part in the decision making by the potential consumer. Such influencers could be writers for technology magazines, technology bloggers, or simply various ‘geeks and nerds’ who contribute to technology forums and are often opinion leaders in various related social networks.

Traditional media
PR plan to be implemented in traditional media is elucidated upon below:
1.     Press Release/Conference
The PR agency will make press releases at various stages preceding the launch. This will be done by personally contacting journalists and reporters as well as publishing an online press room dedicated to the purpose.
While making such press releases it should be kept in mind that the content is short, succinct, concise and objective to capture the interest of news makers. It shouldn’t look like a free advertisement, otherwise broadcasters and publishers may not release it to the masses.
Near to the launch a press conference will also be arranged for various concerned technical publications and broadcasters. In this conference the various benefits and features of the phone will be elaborated upon.
2.     Public Interaction with company officials
The public relations program relating to conferences and interviews would involve company officials to interact with various media personnel and masses. Usually it is observed that the CEO is pushed amidst public glare to handle all questions. However for a technology product it is recommended to send someone who is passionate about the product (for interviews on technology related platforms) and knows it in and out; even its weaknesses. CEO and other officials should attend lifestyle gatherings. However, all members of such interview teams should be well versed with key product features and Samsung’s stand on the Apple-Samsung court conflict. Knowing one’s weaknesses, stand on important issues and, purpose and benefit of product will help in handling criticism effectively.
3.     Print
The print media employed for pre launch PR exercise for Samsung will be of three types chiefly:
a)      Newspapers- which are mass consumed, such as Sun and The Guardian can be aimed for press releases and advertisement features. Journalists of such publications should be contacted and be provided with clear and concise information (with attractive pictures) about the product launch.
b)      Magazines- Press release can be targeted to lifestyle magazines as well. However, this process should be commenced 2-3 months in advance as magazines are planned over long periods. Also content in such magazines should focus on status and lifestyle value of the proposition.
c)       Technical Journals- should be provided with the technical specifics and detailed review of the product. All technical benefits and superiority of the product should be logically stated so as to appeal to the editors and audience (which is ‘techie’) of such magazines.
4.     Television
An average person in the UK watches TV for approximately 4.6 hours a day. This is a lot of exposure to the screen hence, TVs importance as a public relations tool cannot be ignored. Various tech shows, interviews/debates and news rooms can be approached before the launch to build a buzz for the product. Planning for such events will require week to fortnight in advance of scheduled dates. Also, company officials (who will represent on such shows) must be thoroughly educated about the product and other issues. Additionally advertisement features can be broadcasted to build excitement around the launch.  
5.     Radio
Approximately 85% people in the UK listen to radio during the day. This could be while commuting or at other leisure times of the day. Radio (just as television broadcast) can be used to build excitement around the product. Various contests on radio channels relating to S4 can be hosted to stimulate a viral campaign. Additionally company representatives can be scheduled for interviews by popular RJs (on programs connecting with the target market). Attention must be paid whether such radio shows are technical or pop culture related, representative choice should be made according to the requirements of the show. Although radio communication tends to be short lived but, it can go a long way in building sub conscious perception and attitudes influencing final decisions about the product.

Social Media
1.     Social networking sites
Websites such as Facebook and Pinterest can be of critical importance in building awareness about the product; especially when their use is free to all. However, to attract the public gaze amidst the clutter of information on such platforms is a difficult task. We will allocate a budget for paid advertising on such platforms so audience can be directed to pages where attention grabbing information about the product launch is posted. Keeping the message very short but effective along with good pictures will be important here.
The PR efforts on this platform for S4 should start from the existing platform built by Samsung (for example existing facebook page) 2-3 months preceding launch and should continue post launch until the next generation product is conceived.
2.     Blogs
Blogs especially technical have a big role in influencing purchase decisions for technology products such as S4. Surveys have shown that a large number of people (an absolute majority) trusts these bloggers as opinion leaders and take their word for it! Providing clear detailed information about the key features, purpose, benefits and relevance of the product to such bloggers is essential to ascertain a positive word about the launch on blogs.
An ideal letter to a blogger should be on the following lines:
The S4 is developed on ___platform, apart from having ___features it sets itself apart by providing ____technological innovation, which is a first. The user will benefit from the futuristic application which is unparalleled. Also the minimalistic design scheme makes a lifestyle statement and keeps in tune with the potential user’s choices.
3.     Forums
Forums are another platform where technology freaks interact and discuss about products. The 1-9-90 rule should be kept in mind while feeding information on such forums. That is, 1% person initiates discussion. Usually 9% provide responses and the rest 90% absorbs the information. Here too, people often visit just to gain information from ‘learned’ opinion leaders who participate on such forums. Providing accurate information here will help develop an unbiased, healthy and positive word about the product and company’s reputation.
Providing accurate information to bloggers as well as moderators on such forums should do the required. However, posting under fake names should be avoided as it is generally discovered and criticised. Samsung should avoid directly participating in discussions on such forums and if at all it does, identity should be fully disclosed to gain credibility.

4.     Other Websites/Online Press Rooms

Mediums such as online ads on various search engines will also be utilised to direct target population on relevant pages relating to the product. Information feed to various other websites will also be provided which help in forming public opinion. Such websites could be news sites or comparison websites. They are of extreme relevance in case of technology products, where the sheer pace at which technology changes and the availability of plethora of options, makes the general populace demand a source of objective and relevant information (and at times opinion too). Also online press rooms will be maintained to feed written, pictorial and video information to various press and media entities.

Timeline

The prospective launch date for Samsung S4 should be in the month of March or April of 2013. The underlying reasons for fixing such months for the launch are:
1.       Press releases and features in magazines would require planning at least 2 months ahead of the launch date.
2.       Building momentum and following on social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter will also require 1-2 months of active campaigning on such media.
3.       Finding appropriate slots and pitching at the right moments for publicity via newspapers will also require patient watch keeping.
4.       It is speculated that Apple will launch iphone6 (competition to S4) next year (that is 2014); by launching early, Samsung can gain market share and loyalty also, gaining a chance to prove to the public that it does not plagiarises technology that some other company (as Apple) develops.
Hence, if efforts are to start post Christmas 2012, the launch date must be 3-4 months ahead of commencement of such PR efforts. 

Conclusion

The report has been effective in providing a sketch of PR efforts that will be required to launch Samsung S4 in the UK market. The report highlights the key media that will be required for communication along with effective approaches to communication. The crux of the report lies in designing the most efficient strategy under the budget constraints and timelines, which will help in establishing market share and countering competition.

References

1.       M.t3.com/news/iphone-6-release-date-rumours-features-and-news
2.       www.expertreview.co.uk
3.       M.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/mar/05/Samsung-galaxy-s4-leak-phone
4.       www.wired.co.uk
5.       Mobile.pcadvisor.co.uk
6.       M.techradar.com
7.       www.dailymail.co.uk
8.       www.newstribe.com
9.       www.apple.com/iphone/
10.   M.t3.com/news/Samsung-galaxy-s4-will-surprise-and-delight-on-march-14-says-leading-analyst


TruEarth Healthy Foods: Market Research for a New Product Introduction

Introduction
1980s saw an increasing account of dual income households in America. With mothers, wives and sisters working out of homes to contribute towards the family income for a better lifestyle; there was also the incidence of ‘time poverty’ with less time remaining to cook meals at home. DeRosa founder of TruEarth started the company to take advantage of the opportunity and sell ready to eat healthy gourmet meals to the rising middle class.
TruEarth launched Cucina Fresca, its gourmet pasta range which was an instant hit in the market. It now deliberates over launching a healthy ready to eat pizza range. Given the market size of $4.4 billion of this particular category, launching the pizza offering is quite lucrative to TruEarth. However, it has to be careful in choosing the right course of action by taking into account, reception by the prospective customer and the strategies of its various competitors in this segment.

Problem Analysis

The estimated size of pizza market in the USA is about $53 billion (2007). Of this two thirds of the turnover comes from restaurants, deliveries and take aways. Just about 11% which is approximately $4.4 billion from the total turnover, comes from the refrigerated pizza sales. This is the segment TruEarth is eyeing. However, as players such as Nestle and Kraft already have presence in the segment with their low cost offering and a close competitor Rigazzi is gearing up to launch a similar product as TruEarth’s, focus of TruEarth is on coming up with a pizza which is not only rightly priced but is also healthy and tastes good.
 TruEarth can take over this segment by simply materialising on the fact that most pizza consumers do not want to cut on their pizza consumption. Almost 33% have expressed that they’d want a pizza offering which is healthier than the usual pizza. Hence the need gap is quite obvious and moving at the right time can bring huge profits to the company.

Problem Statement

Thus, gauging from the situation, TruEarth’s problem is deciding between two proposed ways to proceed. That is, either to capitalise on a first mover’s advantage with its unique offering or to wait for Rigazzi to take the first step and then follow it afterwards.

Alternatives

The alternatives present in this case are two and our explained below:
1.       The first option is to gain on a first mover’s advantage; taking the market by storm and establishing a substantial market share by aggressive marketing.  
2.       The second option is to launch after Rigazzi and gain a better idea of how the market is likely to react to the offering by TruEarth. This is a safer approach if TruEarth is unsure of the results of the various researches it conducted.

Recommendation

The best approach for TruEarth will to launch first and take the first mover’s advantage. The company has already successfully launched Cucina Fresca on the basis of Nielsen BASE research method; and if the results of the study are to be believed for this new offering than surely TruEarth should kaunch first and capture the market.
The company needs only about $12 million of sales revenue to break even in the first year. As the survey and studies point out that, even if the product turns out to be mediocre the revenues will be approximately $14.5 million in the first year. If the product turns out to be excellent, TruEarth may see approximate total revenue of $22.6 million. Thus, the company gains in either case, should the product turn out to be mediocre or excellent.

Conclusion

The case analysis has been successful as far as arriving at the best possible solution to the problem is concerned. However, it is recommended for the managers at TruEarth to double check the results of various studies conducted under the Nielsen BASE method. Also, corrective measures should be taken according to the knowledge unearthed about consumer preferences (such as making crust less chewy and making the pizza reasonably priced). Lastly managers should endeavour to find out about the attitudes and trend in markets other than the high potential ones to have a clearer understanding of the product’s appeal and its prospect of gaining a sizeable market share and penetration.           


TruEarth Healthy Foods: Market Research for a New Product Introduction

Introduction
The late 1980s saw a growing demand for healthy, gourmet food products vis-à-vis mass produced highly processed food. The trend of dual income households where homemakers were eventually coming out to earn for a better lifestyle was on the rise. However this trend also implied that there was increasing time poverty at the hands of a usual household to prepare meals at home. Hence, there was also the incident of increasing guilt among mothers and wives who were not able to provide healthy home cooked meals to their family. DeRosa started TruEarth to capitalise on this opportunity of providing ready to eat healthy gourmet preparations to these growing dual income households.
In 2006, Eckstein a brand manager at TruEarth spearheaded the launch of a new product line Cucina Fresca, under which fresh whole grain pasta meal kits were promoted. Although a break even sales of only 12 million $ was required in the first year (to meet the advertising, promotional and other costs), the product brought a total revenue of 18 million $ in the first year and 35 million $ in the second year. By far it was one of the most successful launches in the company’s history. However, sales began to drop as competitors such as Rigazzi, Nestle and Kraft geared up in promoting similar products. However, sustaining its first mover advantage and sizeable market share, TruEarth is thinking on the lines of launching a unique healthy pizza offering.
Pizzas are a prime menu option in the Italian-American food category. With over $53 billion in estimated annual sales in 2007, Pizza is one of the most lucrative food categories for a player like TruEarth. The store-bought Pizza market estimates to around 11% of this $53 billion market and stands around $4.4 billion in sales (2007). However, Pizza sales in recent years have been hit by rising health concerns and popularity of diets which restrict unhealthy food intakes. TruEarth intends to capitalise on this opportunity by introducing a healthy pizza option since it has been observed as a result of various surveys that the target population craves for pizza although it wants them to be ‘healthy’ too. Also, little modification is needed to the existing infrastructure to produce the new product. This provides a positive impetus to monetize on the opportunity at hand.

Situation and Problem Analysis

As stated earlier the estimated size of the American pizza market in 2007 was around $53 billion out of which two thirds of the pizza sales came from delivery, take outs and restaurants. Only 11% of the total revenue came from store bought refrigerated pizza, which equals to around $4.4 billion in sales. This is the segment of interest to TruEarth. However, TruEarth competes with the likes of Nestle, Kraft and Rigazzi for a share in this market. As pointed out by Rosie Carlton (Director of business development at TruEarth) success of the pizza range will depend on delivering a crust as good as a take-out pizza; as Kraft and Nestle already have low priced pizza offering in the market.
TruEarth also has to compete for space in consumer preferences for options such as restaurants, deliveries and take-away.
The major opportunity for TruEarth comes from the fact that people don’t want to cut out on their pizza consumption and also want a healthier option – with 33% restaurant goers citing a strong interest in healthy crusts, in a survey. Although certain pizzerias in metropolitans offer whole wheat or multi grain crusts, opportunity exists for providing a pizza fresher than frozen pizza, healthier than take away and one which allows consumer to modify taste suitably, to give that special home cooked feel. Hope is provided by the fact produced by a mall intercept survey, which shows how people are willing to change to TruEarth pizza consumption in subsequent eating pizza eating occasions as compared to previous pizza eating occasions.
Stated below is a brief SWOT analysis to arrive at the core problem at hand:

Strengths

The core strength of this proposition lies in the fact that firstly, the offering is going to be a nutritious and healthy one, and close to substitutes such as fresh home cooked meals. Secondly, by providing the options for various toppings flexibility has been provided to the consumer to mould the product according to individual tastes. Lastly, 30% of the population which favoured TruEarth (determined in various surveys and research initiatives) stated that no improvements were needed to the offering designed by the company; this was a positive indicator since 30% of the population is a large part of the market targeted.

Weakness

It was determined that the Pizza offering by TruEarth would feed only 2-3 people. Also, 29% of the population participating in home trials concluded that the price needed to be revised downwards. When compared to pricing by restaurants and take away, the prices were still high. So conclusively there was a need to reduce the prices in order to appeal to the pockets of the target consumer. Also a requisite product modification found in the surveys was that around 7% of the population in favour wanted the crust to be less chewy; also 20% of the population which was unfavourable cited the same change in the crust.

Opportunities

There are only three main opportunities with regards to launching the pizza. Firstly, the market’s size itself ($53 billion out of which 11% is the core target market for TruEarth). Secondly, the fact that the American consumer does not want to cut out on Pizza consumption and still rising awareness about health concerns and ill effects of available pizza options is making the consumer crave for a healthier pizza meal. Almost 33% of population on a survey ‘strongly desired’ a healthy pizza meal option. Thirdly, the real opportunity lies in providing an option healthier than take away (or restaurants) and fresher than frozen pizza, and one which is pocket friendly too.

Threats

 TruEarth faces some serious threats concerning its pizza product launch intentions. One of the major threats concerning the proposition comes from the likes of Nestle and Kraft, which already have low cost frozen pizza preparations in the market. To counter these TruEarth need to have real good crust which matches that of take out. Second threat comes from Rigazzi which is one of the closest competitor of TruEarth and is planning to launch a similar offering as TruEarth’s very soon. The problem facing the company in this regard is the pressure to capitalise on a first mover’s advantage or toe in line with Rigazzi as the leader. The last of threats, manifests itself in the lack of an in depth study of the situation. Since the research and study has been conducted in high potential markets only, a fair idea of true market penetration and reception of the product cannot be gauged from these studies.

Problem Statement

Summing up from the above, TruEarth’s problem with regard to the new product proposition, is essentially of choice and lies in the pressure to either act swiftly and gain a first mover’s advantage over Rigazzi; or, to launch after Rigazzi, and lose on the first mover advantage but gain on insight.

Alternative courses of action

If we study the nature of the problem itself, the alternative courses of action are quite evident in the statement of the problem. The alternatives present in this case are two and our explained below:
1.       The first alternative present is to launch before Rigazzi and gain a first mover’s advantage. The benefits of this approach will be that launching first will provide better time to TruEarth to penetrate the market properly and establish hold before other players come in (this first move is also to be teamed up with aggressive marketing efforts for desired effects). The advantages of launching first have been enjoyed by TruEarth in success of Cucina Fresca.
2.       A second alternative is to launch after Rigazzi’s pizza offering launch. This will provide TruEarth with a better and realistic insight into market trends with regards to the proposed product. Hence, TruEarth will be in a better position to modify according to market needs or take pre-emptive steps in this regard. This should be the alternative of choice, if TruEarth is doubtful about the appeal of its offering or is not satisfied or fully convinced by the research Nielsen has undertaken.

Recommended Course of Action

I would recommend TruEarth to take a first mover’s advantage in launching its pizza offering. The company has already seen the advantages of moving first in case of its pasta offering Cucina Fresca.
Being a niche product present due to a clearly defined opportunity of a demand for healthy ready to eat meals, it suits TruEarth better to launch first and capture market share by Gorilla marketing efforts to guard itself against biggies such as Nestle and Kraft. Should it choose to penetrate into markets already held by Nestle, Kraft and the likes, it will find itself in deep trouble since competitors as Nestle can easily oust competition by huge marketing budgets and influence in the localities they operate in.
Also, one must pay attention to the results of various research findings unearthed by Nielsen’s Base I and II method:
The company needs only about $12 million of sales revenue to break even in the first year. As the survey and studies point out that, even if the product turns out to be mediocre the revenues will be approximately $14.5 million in the first year (the consumer’s taste and other buying preferences have been studied thoroughly in various surveys and studies so a reasonable estimate about the mediocrity or excellence of the product can be made).
If the product turns out to be excellent, TruEarth may see approximate total revenue of $22.6 million.
So in both the cases (mediocre or excellent) the revenue is higher than what the company needs to break even in the first year. Hence, gaining on the first mover’s advantage should be the preferred course of action in this case.

Conclusion


Concluding from the case study analysis by way of studying the situation, determining the problem and analysing the available alternatives, we have been able to recommend a course of action that should be taken by the company. However, it would do good to the managers at TruEarth to carefully study and analyse the BASE research findings in context of the proposition made, to take pre-emptive action to modify the offering on the basis of consumer feedbacks in various surveys (such as making crust less chewy and making the pizza reasonably priced) and to find out about the attitudes and trend in markets other than the high potential ones to have a clearer understanding of the product’s appeal and its prospect of gaining a sizeable market share and penetration.            

Strategic Management

The macro environment analysis of the recently restructured electricity industry has brought about a mix of opportunities and threats, which are likely to determine the future course for a majority of firms involved in this business. Given that electricity is a necessity in the end user’s lifestyle and there are only 4 companies in Victoria which provide the majority power supply, automatically this provides a market power to these companies to influence price in their favour.
However, attention must also be paid to threats such as relatively easier access to this industry which is making it lucrative for potential new entrants. This threat by new competition can undermine the monopolistic positions held by existing players; ultimately leading to competitive battles such as price wars, ousting weaklings and loss of customers to competitors. Attention must also be paid to the influence of international communities to bring into force (through the government) legislations such as CPRS (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme) which promote use of clean fuels and inflict levies on units utilising ‘polluting fuels’ such as brown coal. This will make such ‘polluting’ units financially unattractive to the end users, due to the increased prices.
A brighter side to this picture is painted by the fact that generation firms are coming together (by means of trade association, organisations and strategic partnerships) to lobby for favourable government policies and to help each other in undertaking capital intensive research and development for mutual benefit. Diversifying in terms of fuel sources and electricity distribution may help firms to reduce supplier’s bargaining power and control and command costs and prices.  Also firms having good relationship with stakeholders such as customers tend to benefit from competitive advantage in this regard.

Regulating market power of firms will help protect consumer’s interest. Also, government help to sustain the industry in difficult times and the gradual adoption of clean technologies light the way for the future.

Monday, 22 September 2014

A Review of Sustainable Development Approaches Undertaken by Leading Global Businesses

1.     Executive Summary

The researcher by way of this report has endeavoured to bring to light the motives behind sustainable environmental practices program initiated by global businesses such as McDonald’s and KFC. The report structure has utilised the five pillars (corporate operations, restaurant operations, sustainable operations, advocacy & partnerships and culture & communication) of responsible business practices laid down by McDonalds to compare and contrast with the approach in sustainable business practices followed by KFC.
The findings of the report have been astounding. McDonald’s which has widely advertised its environment friendly approaches has done a mere window dressing of the issue. The organisation which owns only a third of the outlets (approx 250 out of a total of 869) in Australia has implemented the sustainable development programs as mere pilot projects at selected owned outlets only and has failed to generalise any such approaches to its mass business environment. On the other hand KFC’s actions in this regard have been more convincing, as the fast food giant has been able to implement the green approaches at more than 75% of its outlets. Sections in this report carefully analyse and compare the efforts made by each organisation based on facts published in their annual CSR reports and various scholarly articles.





















Table of Contents


2.     Introduction

In the recent years an increasing number of global businesses are developing approaches to sustainable development, which can be incorporated in their usual business dynamics. Some of these businesses are making these environmentally conscious (and social development related) decisions to mitigate the negative criticisms levied on their operations by various interest groups (such as environment protection organisations such as, Greenpeace); others are incorporating such an ideology as a proactive measure to ensure a greener tomorrow and nurture healthy relationships with communities.
The subject of this particular paper is to study the approaches to sustainable development undertaken by McDonalds (which is a global fast food giant). Also this paper will contrast the choices made by McDonalds as against those made by another global leader in food retail, KFC (Refer to Appendix 1 for a statistical comparison of the two companies). The purpose of this exercise will be to firstly, state the various achievements and initiatives of the organisations in question; secondly, to analyse the motive behind such actions; and lastly to determine the efficacy of such programs in sustainable development, on implementation.
The structure of this paper will closely follow analysing the five pillar program to sustainable development laid down by McDonald’s. This consists of, corporate operations, Restaurant operations, Sustainable operations, Advocacy & Partnerships and Culture & Communication.

3.     Corporate Operations

Corporate operation is the heart of all sustainable development approaches McDonald’s currently employs. Corporate is that part of the business framework which makes all crucial decisions regarding the operation of the actual business of McDonald’s. All environmentally conscious ideas such as using bio fuel in delivery trucks to cleaning drives have their inception and implementation done by the corporate. Of late the McDonald’s corporate has shown strong solidarity for environmental and health concerns by participating in the Earth hour campaign and promoting it through its restaurants, and by making its marketing approach more responsible by reducing the advertisement of toys to attract children to the restaurant, by 80% since 2002.
KFC’s corporate operations show a similar trend when compared to operations of McDonald’s. The global fast food retail giant has shown concern towards the communities the business impacts and has taken measures to align its businesses to environmentally responsible methods like responsible sourcing of chicken, recycling of packaging and reducing adverse environmental impact of its restaurant holdings to minimise adverse effects on the environment and minimising costs of business operations incurred by the community (by way of depletion of common resources such as quality of air and water).
However, operations of the fast food giant have been criticised, as a defensive move to counter negative criticisms rather than an exercise in pro actively managing sustainable growth. Critics have been stern in accusing McDonald’s of following approaches such as advertising toys to lure kids into the restaurant promoting unhealthy food habits among an immature population. Also, the junk food giant has been accused of ignoring the harmful effects of mass producing of standardised agro products at the lowest prices, leading to depletion of natural resources and adversely affecting the availability of food supplies to the general population.
It can be summed up, that McDonald’s and KFC need to be pro active in assuming the role of a leader in sustainable development, in its industry, rather than being defensive in taking up such policies in order to mitigate criticism.

4.     Restaurant Operations

McDonald’s has taken a variety of steps to lower greenhouse gas emissions and reduce carbon footprint of its restaurants. This has been done chiefly by:
4.1  Reducing water usage by using efficient equipment and incorporating rain water harvesting systems while landscaping.
4.2  Minimise energy usage by using energy efficient equipment such as LED lighting.
4.3  Innovating on packaging and products such as napkin dispensers to reduce wastage and use of materials.
4.4  Recycling by products and wastes in the processes and operating cleaning drives to keep surrounding clean.
KFC has undertaken certain similar steps in making its restaurants eco friendly. Overall it has been able to reduce CO2 emissions by 25% per tonne of construction material used by using alternatives for timber products and sustainable material. Simple thoughtful steps like reducing electric signage and using covered bike racks to reduce four wheeler use has resulted in savings as well as reducing carbon footprint. Technologies like dual flush cistern and waterless urinals have helped save 92,000 litres/ year per restaurant.   
Although organisations such as PETA may still argue that McDonald’s processing beef wastes ten times the water needed to process vegetarian food, it is important to note that the use of current eco friendly energy efficient processes and equipment have resulted in various benefits accruing to the company. In case of McDonald’s this has been by way of benefits such as reduction in water usage by 60% in case of spray guns, reducing energy usage by 50% in car parks by using LED lights, new fry vats which utilise 40% less oil in cooking and the like. KFC has benefitted in a similar manner. However, where implementation of such programs has already been done across almost all KFC holdings, McDonald’s is running green technologies in its restaurants only at certain limited facilities, mostly as pilot projects. Nevertheless the result of implementing ‘green measures’ has not only made actual cash savings for this business but have also helped in spreading a positive word about them.

5.     Sustainable operations

Of late, McDonald’s has undertaken various measures to make its operations sustainable in context of environment protection. Innovating in areas like using used cooking oil as biodiesel to fuel delivery trucks, innovative packaging to minimise wastage of materials, waste management to reduce waste diversion to landfills and ensure recycling and use of recycled products in various operations, are just some of the steps in this regard. 
KFC is of a similar view when it comes to sustainable operations. However, unlike McDonald’s most of KFC’s environmental programs are implemented across majority of its restaurants. For example, each year 7.75m Litres of low trans fat vegetable oil is collected from KFC restaurants in the UK to be converted into biodiesel to fuel delivery trucks. On the other hand, McDonald’s sustainable development program have been criticised as being mere lip service when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility. Majority of its programs lack any environmental value until they are introduced on a mass level. For instance the use of biodiesel is limited to the units operating in Victoria; most sustainable operations are limited to specific restaurants as pilot projects (that too only company owned restaurants which are about 250 out of over 869 functioning McDonald’s restaurants in Australia). Critics are also of the view, that McDonald’s has failed to address issues like depletion of soil and pollution caused due to mass standardised farming practices encouraged by McDonald’s.
To sum up, it can be said that while KFC has published certain measurable progress and benefits of its various initiatives, McDonald’s programs are more of painting a rosy picture of the company than producing some actual results.

6.     Advocacy and Partnerships

McDonald’s has joined hands with certain organisations to build awareness on certain issues as well as to make the objectives of these organisations a part of its own policies.
6.1   Rainforest Alliance- McDonald’s has sourced 1.5 million kilograms of coffee for its Australian operations from Rainforest Alliance program certified farms; promoting sustainable agricultural practices and forest conservation in context of coffee plantations.
6.2   Foodbank Australia- Partnering with Foodbank to divert all excess food supplies to the bank, helping make Australia hunger free.
6.3   Roundtable for sustainable beef Australia (RSBA)- McDonald’s is one of the founding members of this organisation promoting ethical and sustainable practices in beef supply chain.
KFC also focuses on certain such alliances to advocate and promote the cause of certain organisations. KFC is a signatory to the Australian packaging covenant; which requires it to follow sustainable development approaches while designing and implementing packaging, reducing wastage and encouraging recycle of materials used. Also KFC has heeded to pleas of organisations such as PETA and is advocating responsible sourcing and humane treatment and slaughter of chicken, which is a primary raw material for most KFC preparations.
Critics are of the view that organisations such as McDonald’s by creating in house programs such as RSBA are only promoting their own cause than doing any actual good to the environment. Concern groups such as PETA (Fig 1.1 and 1.2) have criticised McDonald’s for cruel practices in procurement of meat products. Despite having a mechanism such as RSBA in place, McDonald’s fails to monitor the actual ranches where the beef producing cattle is raised. Other programs such as Rainforest Alliance and Foodbank have been undertaken in only limited markets and only limited procurement is done under such programs. Adverse effects of farming practices encouraged by McDonald’s has been criticised by international environment watchdog Greenpeace.
True that the businesses are at times dressing up their operations to make a positive impression however, certain practices have real benefits associated with them. For example adhering to Australian packaging covenant (by KFC) has really helped reduce environmental impact and result in savings for the fast food retailer (Fig 2.1).

7.     Culture and Communication

McDonald’s is trying to build a culture of sustainable environment friendly practices among its various stakeholders. For instance, employees at various facilities volunteer in the clean drive programs aimed to make neighbourhoods litter free, customer’s are also requested (by notices near or in the restaurant) not to litter, and the organisation participates in endeavours such as Earth Hour (initiated by World Wildlife Fund) by not only switching off electric equipment at its offices but also promoting the cause by printing material to educate customers at its various restaurants. Overall, the promotion of such a culture and communicating it to third parties, actions groups and governments can be viewed as an exercise in building favourable public relations however, the representatives of the organisation say that it is just a part of the core beliefs of the organisation.
KFC follows a similar culture of promoting environmental sustainability and community development. Especially its environment sustainability approaches which have been generalised to a major part of its restaurant holdings. Also KFC has been under major criticism from various interest groups like PETA. In recent years KFC has made an effort to heed to these criticism and modify its approaches to commonly acceptable ones such as humane treatment of animals and responsible sourcing of supplies.
Comparing the culture and communication of both the organisation it may be said that both of them may be doing it to guise the negative effects of their various processes. However, one may see some consistency of approach and dedication in case of KFC where the non vegetarian fast food company even makes efforts to generalise the practices on a scalable level across the organisation. However, in case of McDonald’s it seems as half hearted efforts done more to please critics than to actually bring about a change. Most of the points stated in its annual corporate responsibility and sustainability report seem like mere ideas which are yet to be put in action - without any stated measurable results, until now.

8.     Conclusion

Essentially KFC is an organisation which seems committed to incorporate sustainable environment development practices in its various business functions. On the other hand, McDonald’s though superficially seems to be following a similar approach, has failed to scale up such practices to be implemented across majority of its facilities. Although both of them seem to have taken up sustainable development approaches to mitigate opposition and criticism slammed by various interests groups and governments, KFC has made actual efforts to improve and has been thorough in implementing change. While McDonalds’ efforts still lack commitment and are mere window dressing to address the opposition.   
By comparing McDonalds and KFC across the five parameters laid down by McDonalds itself, the various differences in approach to handling the issue of sustainable development has come to light by the medium of this paper.

9.     References        

1.    McDonalds’ corporate responsibility and sustainability report 2012.
2.    Moore E.S. & R.J. Lutz (2000). Children, Advertising, and Product Experience: A multi-method inquiry. Journal of consumer research, 27(1),June, 31-6
3.    McDonald’s Report: More Corporate Social Irresponsibility By Paul Hawken

4.    Can McDonald's lead in green? By Jennifer Inez Ward; Published April 30, 2012 (Green Biz.com)

5.    McDonald’s CSR Report A Nutritious Meal, But Critics Want More; Andrew W. Singer; May/June 2009
6.    Yum! Restaurants Australia Pty. Ltd. Australian Packaging Covenant Action Plan 2010 – 2015
7.    www.kfcdevelopment.co.uk/sustainability
9.       McDonald's: We Need To Define What 'Sustainable' Beef Means; The Huffington Post  |  By Rachel Tepper Posted: 09/27/2012 2:45 pm

 Fig 1.1
 Fig 1.2

Fig 2.1
Shows percentage of various packaging materials used by YUM food brands KFC and Pizza Hut in Australia.






Appendix 1

McDonald's

KFC

Overview
 Over 31,000 restaurants in 118 countries; $23.5 billion revenue, 400,000 employees

 Over 17,000 locations in over 115 countries, $9.5 billion revenue (FY09); 190,000 partners (employees)

Product
Premium salads, fruit and yogurt parfait, and apple dippers in Happy Meal choices; packaging gives customers essential nutrition information in easy-to-understand icon and bar chart format

Chicken preparations, like sandwiches, chicken wraps and pressure fried chicken.

Management
Practices
Carefully managing supply chain to control costs and implement sustainability, and developing an environmental scorecard to measure supplier performance

Managing supply chain and implementing green measures in a way to ensure savings too. Sustainable approaches generally influenced by criticism from groups such as PETA and Greenpeace.


Earth
About 82% of the consumer packaging used in its nine largest markets made from renewable materials and 30% of the material comes from recycled fiber. Despite testing of innovative materials, have not yet identified more sustainable packaging materials that are commercially viable
Use of recycled packaging material and alternative material to reduce environmental impact and keeping sustainable approaches in mind while design packaging has resulted in savings and reducing carbon footprint of KFC. 
Trust
Guidelines to determine the sustainability of fisheries developed in partnership with Conservation International
Responsible sourcing of chicken and fish (and other animal products), reducing carbon footprint by thoughtfully designing packaging and restaurant facilities are some of the initiatives to develop trust among various stakeholders.